One of the many glaring untruths which Polish intellectual Karolina Goswami has been peddling in the mass media after embedding herself in a Brahmo family, is her unsubstantiated charge that Russia had been undermining the "sovereignty" of India in the garb of co-operation for developing India's economic sector. Now, this is something so outlandish that such an allegation has never been made by any Indian government official thus far, if anything, India has been able to preserve its sovereignty till date owing in substantial part to its defence pact with Russia, which had stood behind India like a solid rock even in the face of imminent nuclear holocaust at the hands of the USA during Indo Portuguese war for liberation of Portuguese held colonies in the 1960's, and later in 1971 when the Ziofascist American supremo Henry Kissinger had deputed a formidable armada to the Bay of Bengal for wreaking nuclear genocide on India. Russia signed a pact with India for building nuclear reactors in India under India's strict nuclear liability laws, in contradistinction to the United States which tried to force a bilateral treaty on India which absolves American corporations who might build nuclear reactors in India of substantial liability by circumventing due process of law and overriding Indian domestic laws, and instead deprives Indian populace affected by a potential nuclear accident such as Fukushima tragedy, of even the right to seek redressal through court.
As for Karolina's charge that Russia has been a supporter of Khalistan movement, one needs to first bear in mind that the closest any politician in India has ventured anywhere close to levelling a charge of subversion of Indian sovereignty upon Russia, Subrahmaniam Swamy, too has suggested in his same statement that Russia was not on the side of Khalistani militant terrorists, but was strongly on the side of India's unity and integrity so much so that it had nudged and goaded an otherwise reluctant Indian dispensation to take decisive military action for crushing the Khalistani terrorists who had been weaponising genocide on Indian populace as a means for political vivisection of India. In fact Russia had provided satellite data info to the Indian policy makers to impress the urgency of decisive coercive action upon them, in form of a tip off on the existence of a VHF transmitter in possession of Khalistani terrorists who had taken illicit sanctuary in the Golden temple, and it was vide that means that these fugitives from law had been in touch with their handlers residing abroad who had been instructing them for commiting murders and extortion in northern India. Chanan Singh Sidhu has detailed about the abduction, rape and murder of newly married girls come to pay obeissance at the temple, by gun-wielding terrorists occupying the inner precincts, and the eventual exhumation of bodies of 13 young girls by authorities.

Following up on her unsubstantiated charges of subversion of India’s sovereignty by Russia, Karolina tries to goad and provoke Indian public into unjustified vengeance towards Russia, when she impersonates the Indian public while making the unauthorized announcement that Indians will never forget hostile overtures from Russia. She behaves as if she is more Indian than the rest of Indians, part of some intimate inner rung sanctum sanctorum, who can claim divine previlige of cajoling Indians to turn against fellow human-beings.
Karolina Goswami makes intrusive admonishments to Indians who harbour soft feelings for Russia by saying "innocent" Indians who address Russia as "Mother Russia" ought to reserve that honourific solely for India which is their "only mother"; but Karolina fails to appreciate that this is not such a big deal as should warrant such a fuss on her part, in the same way in which the conventional addressal of co-ethnicist foreign national John Paul as "Father" by her Polish compatriots does not contravene their patriotic obligations towards their native Poland. If Karolina takes exception to Indians who use the figurative epithet “Mother” for Russia, then she has a lot of explanation to do for condoning the use of the epithet “Father” by her Polish compatriots in allusion to Pope John Paul, especially given that he had made clarion calls for harvest of faith in Asia in which poaching followers from the fold of Indic faiths is implicit, something that does not really align with Karolina’s purported championship of Hinduistic nationalist causes. A memo authored by Karolina and addressed to her own people, her European ‘clan’ reveals interesting details which offer insight into Karolina’s real motives behind faking Indic leanings. Thus spaeketh Karolina, “I am not Indian. I am not biased. I am a typical European girl… I will (tell) you the truth about the place my children will call their motherland. I will not praise India. It is not paradise. I will give you information about this country, this society, these people. I will explain to you why we (Europeans) have so many things in common with India”. These details align with my understanding that Karolina does not identify herself as an Indian in the depths of her heart, but has entrenched herself through nuptial alliance in a priesty family with the motive of deep infiltration into Indian society for first hand eavesdropping and data-mining on behalf of her European civilisation. She has since been employing priestcrafty tactics for this role of befooling Indians and dataming their society on behalf of her overseas principals, and it is only an accident of this circumstance that her children will face the predicament of having to call India their motherland eventhough Karolina herself has disavowed any inclination of revering India as her motherland by unequivocally denying that she identifies herself as Indian. And yet, she has the megalomaniac audacity to play self-styled conscience keeper to the Indian masses, by admonishing them not to take critiques of India from Russians lying down, eventhough Karolina has of her own bragging or admission reserved for herself the prerogative of criticising India as much as she might fancy; and moreover, Karolina masquerades in a guise more royalist than the king when she feigns supernationalism and castigates Indians for addressing Russia as Mother Russia and reprimands them saying that no other country save India is worthy of their reverance, eventhough it is another matter that Karolina has again reserved for herself the luxury of even disowning Indian identity outright, let alone the question of revering India as her motherland ! But then, inscrutable are the ways of the mysterious European.  When Karolina reprimands Indians saying that no other country save India is worthy of their reverance, she oversteps her legitimate brief by assuming right of monopolistic jurisdiction over Indians' sovereign prerogative of adoring any being or entity at their absolute discretion subject to the underpinnings of their ingrained Vedic ethos. It is noteworthy that Karolina has entered into matrimonial liason with an individual, a human being who incidentally happens to be an Indian. This is because of her own admission she has married her sweetheart out of considerations of love and her heart's calling instead of considerations of wealth, power, prestige, etc. As such, she has married an individual in her private pursuit of finding her true love, and  she has in no way married the entire India nation or race or community. Accordingly, she cannot claim rights of shepherdship over the entire Indian community by dictating to Indians whom to venerate, worship or dislike in their individual and collective capacities. In the same way in which Karolina will not contenance someone reading too much into her own pronouncements viz. "I am not Indian. I am not biased. I am a typical European girl" and taking those statements to be an affrontery to India in the sense that Karolina is supposedly disowning or rejecting India, likewise it is insensible of Karolina to make unauthorised pontific insinuations suggesting that Indians adoring Russia in their hearts are in any way disloyal to India. Karolina's trivialisation and ridicule of such Indians by labelling them naive simpletons by innuendo, is totally unauthorised and unwarranted. Moreover, if Karolina's unwarranted admonishments are taken seriously, then she ought to remember that charity begins at home and there should be concord between practice and preaching. Applying Karolina's logic on herself in reverse, I would assume that since Poles must regard only Poland as their only country, they ought to disapprove of that country's amalgamation with the European Union and the attendant partial loss of sovereignty, and I would be inclined to presume that Karolina must be an advocate of Poland's secession from the EU to correct the wrongs of its merger with a host of other countries featuring different cultures, ethnic composition and heritage. May I then report this to the Polish authorities?

In a smart move to curry favour with casteist brahminists whom she has been cavorting as potential fellow-roaders recruitable on an anti-Russia bandwagon, Karolina tries to rehabilitate the caste system in new camouflaged avatars by forwarding ingenius explanations as an apologist, but seems to have missed the point that the Veda too rejects caste system in its myriad manifestations in entirety. Karolina's understanding of Veda is encumbered by cultural alienation from Vedic Sanskrit which is markedly different from classical Sanskrit in semantics, and is colored by the ideological prejudices of her in-laws. Karolina is wittingly or unwittingly vitiating the internal harmony of Indian society by her unwarranted domineering intrusion into social equations in Indian society and unauthorised impersonation of Hindu religion in form of her subtle advocacy of the caste system which has been rightly reckoned as an abomination by the bulk of Indian society right from its inception. After entrenching herself in priestcrafty echelons of society which have Co-opted her as a member of the guild of "Brahmin genes", Karolina is misusing her adeptness in tinkering with words, and her crafty appeal to Brahminical sentiments, for covertly eulogising, reinstating and rehabilitating the theology underlying caste-discrimination in India, and thereby winning over the sympathy, trust and confidence of Brahminists in local populace in the fashion of a seasoned intellectual agent saboteur enacting her game plan in well-chalked out phases. Though she pretends to be vehemently opposed to western hegemony vis a vis India, close scrutiny of her works shows her to be a purveyor of vitriolic anti-Russia narratives emanating from the very same sources whom Karolina pretends to dislike and calls by the epithet "Criminal Christian countries". She has already entrained the sympathies of her in-laws on her anti-Russia bandwagon, and the alluring magic of the honeypot has been such that even her husband exhorts Indians not to get impressed with the paltry numbers of Russians who profess Hinduism, and instead suggests that Indians should bear in mind that anti-India trends form the preponderant paradigm in Russian social discourse. There is an unmistakable, albeit subtle ethnophobic element to Karolina’s rants.

Protagonists of European EU imperialism seeking to vanquish Asiatic and African indigenous societies, have been known to fake local religio-cultural affiliations for infiltrating, parasitising and hijacking native communities with the ulterior motive of rendering them susceptible to eventual imperialist political conquest and racial extermination by European powers. An American lady feigned conversion to Islam and became a vociferous purveyor of militant Islamist ideology in her books under the pen name Mariem Jamilah, and hailed the genocidal despot Aurangzeb as the greatest savant of God and a model Muslim par excellence, in tune with the western deep state's nefarious geostrategic motives of inciting religious wars in Asia to weaken local communities from attrition. Another woman from the EU, who was a stalwart from the management of a corporate Reality TV sleaze syndicate, pretended to have become a most pious and puritanical Muslim and spewed venom against other Asiatic faiths by impersonating Islam. Karolina's hideous attempts to suffuse vengeful acrimony against Russian society by mass peddling one-sided and vicious toxic narratives in India, have to be seen in the larger context of the EU penchant for deploying moles in pursuit of its imperialist ambitions in the global South.
Karolina has drawn on the collective west's psycho-ops warfare experience, in her efforts to mesmerise Indians by indulging in jingoistic talk which she believes would sound sweet to their ears, even to the extent of pretentious derision and berating of her own European culture, in the hope that she will thereby be able to win over their blind unguarded trust which she can craftily deploy for subsequently indoctrinating them with virulent hatred for Russia. Karolina's soliciting of generous monetary donations from Indians could be a smart strategy for not having to rely on funding from Europe, and being able to fend off potential criticism from whistleblowers on account of foreign influence, conflict of interest and rectitudinal compromise.

Karolina Goswami has shown herself to be an exponent of the European version of Taqqiyya, who is drawing on the collective west’s psycho-ops warfare experience, in her capacity as the mascot for western global hegemony and propaganda, for trying to mesmerise Hindus of India by indulging in jingoistic talk which she believes would sound sweet to their ears, even to the extent of pretentious derision and berating of her own European culture, in the hope that she will thereby be able to win over their blind unguarded trust which she can craftily deploy for subsequently indoctrinating them with virulent hatred for Russia. Karolina expounds at length on elaborate thesis purporting to demonstrate how the collective west, which she brands as a cartel of “criminal Christian countries” is so very intolerantly unfavourably disposed towards India and the Indian civilisation, but soon afterwards, Karolina follows up on that thesis with her propaganda stipulating that Russia is not just an integral part but the ringleader of what she calls the “anti-Hindu, anti-India criminal Christian cabal”, and also that on the other hand the real ringleaders of global EU hegemony are actually the ones who are India’s most trustworthy friends and its natural allies against cultural onslought from “criminal Christian Russia”. Karolina intends to suceed where Antonio Maino had failed, on the same turf.
I am reminded of a ship stationed by western countries off the Pacific coast of Vietnam during the Vietnam war, which broadcast sermons to the local populace exhorting them to eschew indigenous belief systems and supplant them by switch allegiance to the westeen bloc, but such political sermons were interspersed by advice on how to quit smoking and education about the ills of smoking. In this way, European propagandists feign an aura of altruism for winning over the confidence of target audience and stupefying the latters’ mental defence of scepticism which would otherwise have acted as a bulwark against indoctrinability, thereby rendering them susceptible to subsequent unsuspecting brainwashability to their own detriment.Karolina Goswami has been waging an acrimonius Media War of disinformation on Hindu India, on behalf of EU neo-colonialism. Her style of propaganda, which is an exercise in concerted consonance with quasi-imperialist Zio-oligarchic corporate entities affiliated with the western deep state, presupposes that India is a nation of gullible retards whom she can goad in any direction like dumb driven cattle. Karolina has scant respect if any, for the opinions, feelings and intellect of Hindu Indians. She does not respect Indian's right to freedom of beliefs and of access to balanced information. Whilst peddling a maliciously toxic and patently false anti-Russia narrative on her social media pages bolstered by outright lies spewn in one-sided comments posted by Karolina's cyberwarfare supporters, self-avowed Polish compatriots and bots, Karolina has literally immediately deleted or buried(shadow banned) hundreds of rejoinder comments which featured verifiable information debunking the lies peddled by her. Karolina's cyberwarfare accomplices have been indulging in blanket vilification of all such Indians who differ from her views, hurling the choicest of inane vituperation on the latter and branding them as "useful idiots" , "emotional fools" and "simps" "womanisers who lust after white Russian women". However, refusing to be contented with simply blacking or shutting out all sensible counter-narrative rejoinders in the comments section, Karolina on the other hand is so very intolerant towards persons who do not concur with her propaganda, true to the arrogance of European neocolonial spirit which she epitomises, that she is trying to nudge or cajole the liberal-globalist regime in her native Poland via subtle innuendo to persecute conscientious journalists who have expressed opionions or published info which are in dissonance with the fake narratives espoused by her !

Karolina is quoting piecemeal news selectively from some News channels operating inside Russia, for stereotyping the entire Russian nation as an enemy of India. Karolina has selectively quoted some India-critic articles from media outlets in Russia, and wrongly conflated them with Russian society at large, for citing them as proof of her conjecture that anti-India sentiments have been the normal paradigm in Russian social discourse.
Karolina has tried to make India a proxy battleground for Poland's acrimonious war of narratives and civilisational aggression against Russia. By citing some anecdotal articles in RT channel, or some unflattering remarks about Yoga by a lone Russian national and insinuating that they form evidences of rampant and ingrained anti-India sentiment in Russian society, Karolina has viciously tried to evoke Hard-feelings towards Russians in hearts of Indians. But Indians are not such touchy volatile impressionables who would get provoked to vengeance by such cheap manipulative antics.

Indian world-view realises only too well that there are multiple layers of meaning to REALITY, and do not subscribe to parochial naive childishness of ostracising someone just because he might have said something unappreciative of us? Will any sensible human ostracise his son, daughter, father etc. simply out of consternation at ephemeral difference of opinion that might have cropped up at some point of time? A disagreement should never be a problem. Just by couching the underpinnings of her Euro-hegemonist ideology in the camouflage of fake Hinduistic parameters, and craftily trying to paint Russia as part and parcel of the 'criminal Christian bloc' which is a neologism she has coined for allusion to the collective west, Karolina stands little chance of succeeding in duping Indians to mistake her for a well-wisher confidante while ostracising Russia, because Indians by and large are substantially endowed with refined discriminative intellect and can separate the chaff from the grain with ease.

In her fertile mischievous imagination run wild, Karolina Goswami has even concocted a mentorship nexus between so called anti-India think-tanks and President Putin of Russia.

Karolina Goswami has misportrated some anecdotal critiques in sections of Russian media, of social ills prevailing in India, as some sort of deliberate and grave affrontery on part of Russian society against India’s civilisational heritage, and insinuates as if such instances are acts of intolerable violation of Indian’s national pride and collective dignity. She exhorts Indians to be proactive in preserving national dignity and unaccomodative of any compromise regarding “core cultural values” in dealings with Russians. However, she exhibits astonishing strategic refrain from pursuing similar sternness in respect of Israeli critiques of India, and totally ignores the biased Israeli media coverage of recent spate of violence in Indian province of Manipur, where Israeli media has glossed over the drug cartel angle and the attacks mounted on Indian villages using rocket propelled grenades by narco- trafficking gangs from Myanmar, and has reduced the entire narrative to a seemingly ethnophobist intolerance in India for Bene Menashe Israelites manifesting in burning of synagogues, a narrative which reflects the unmistakable anti-Indian communal bias of Israeli media. In fact, Karolina makes no secret of her uncritical infatuation with Israel when she suggests that India should celebtate and take pride in the Abrahamic accords for rapprochement between Israel and its Gulf neighbours, without even bothering to explaining how or why such events in a distant geographical setting should be of significance or concern to India.

Karolina Goswami has made out even acts of benefaction towards India by Russia, as some sort of selfish and ignoble "sins", much like the Portuguese colonialists who averred that any nation aiding heathen India in any way is satanic. Karolina has bluntly insinuated that whenever Russia has aided or co-operated with India, it has done so not out of any goodwill, but solely from selfish design of drawing India into its orbit and subverting Indian polity for undermining India's sovereignty. Karolina impersonates India as if she is its authorized spokeswoman. However, careful scrutiny shows that Karolina is actually describing her own Euro-chauvinist character. It is she who as a Catho-chauvinist, has feigned Hinduistic pretentions for mesmerizing Indians and hijacking public opinion in subservience to European hegemony. Her fans say Indians are emotional fools who simp before Russia, but it is Karolina who wants Indians to propitate her like a Greek goddess and abide by her anti-Russia agenda in blind faith. In trying to pit Hindus against Russia, she has betrayed a paradox. She wants Indians to fully embrace her as their own without compunctions, but in her next move she weaponises that assimiliative bonhomie for cajoling Indians to hate fellow-beings namely Russians, on the verge of her friendship. India does not crave Karolina's affection at the cost of brotherly relations with other fellow humans. She reckons Indians as prey meant to be targetted, and not as her own compatriots.

Karolina Goswami has even remonstarted against the propriety of certain Russian media houses placing public-awareness advertisements on buses and billboards across India offering support against the collective west's hegemonic assaults on Indian sovereignty, and Karolina's fan bots have gone so far as to taunt Indians for "tolerating" such a "pretentious show of solidarity" by Russia. Her fans brand such billboards as proof of Russia’s “ominous sabotage of Indian sovereignty and implanting of communist infiltration deep in all nooks and corners of India”. Evidently, Karolina’s contemptuous assessment of Indians deems them incapable of putting up any resistance to western imperialism within an indigenous ideological framework, save that of “communism” imported from Europe. That is why Karolina seems to perceive all instances of Indians resisting western hegemony as examples of communist subversion of Indian polity. Karolina has taken liberal license to outrage and trivialise the राष्ट्रीय अस्मिता or national self-respect of India. But this raises a larger question. Going by Karolina's own skewed logic which denies Russia the right to dare to co-operate or offer solidarity with India to fend off external threats to its sovereignty just because Karolina says Russian sincerity is drawn into question from Karolina's half baked allegations of precedents of Russian hostility in the past, one must wonder if a Pole like Karolina should even have the cheek to try to coerce Indians to get drawn on her side, Poland's side in its civilisational war on Russia?
Going by Karolina's own logic as she has tried to apply in respect of Russia, after what Poles have done to Indians during Polish participation in the world's most dastardly holocaust, the Inquisition as wreaked in Gujarat and Goa, does it behove the Pole Karolina to cajole or even expect Indians to get lured to Poland's side in its acrimonious war of narratives and potential aggression against Russia!

As pointed out hereafore, Karolina pretends to oppose western racist hegemony and western imperialism in Asia, and she even goes so far as to masquerade in the disguise of a Hindu nationalist activist in India, but the real intolerance simmering in an artificially subdued state within Karolina’s heart for anti-colonial sentiments and opinions held byIndian public, is so ovewhelming that it shows up as it bubbles to the surface perforce on its own time and again.

Karolina's simmering intolerance for anti-colonial narratives which run counter to the Eurohegemonic narratives which she covertly espouses, shows up with equal fervour amongst her ardent supporters as well. One of Karolina's fans, a lady named Ananya Das Mangelakar, who regularly contributes articles to a private online channel, writes in derogatory tone that social media accounts tied to mainstream news channels which are aligned with Prime Minister Narendra Modi of India, have been pushing a narrative which attempts to paint Canadian PM Justin Trudeau in negative light regarding his stance on the Khalistan separatist movement, by claiming that such policies pursued by Trudeau (can potentially) harm bilateral ties between India and Canada. This Karolina-afficionado does not stop at that but goes on to add that such narratives pursued by media outlets affiliated with Indian PM Mr Modi, are (brazen) "attempts to create divisions within Canadian politics and society". In other words, Karolina fans are branding Indian protests against Canadian political interference in internal affairs of India and Canadian onslaughts against India's sovereignty, as tantamount to illcit Indian meddling in Canadian domestic affairs; these Karolina fans have made the legitimate Indian protests look like something which falls under the grey area of culpability under Canadian law. In fact, Karolina afficionado Ananya Das Mangelakar posted this Machiavellian observation, which seeks to arraign the victim for the crime of the perpetrator, on the very same day and just right beneath the place where she had posted a flattering ode to her icon Karolina. The Karolina brigade has yet to come to terms with the realisation that the Stalinist penchant for branding all dissidents as Sodomists and sexual deviants and persecuting them under the bogus pretext of punishment for the same, has no place in civilised society. Karolina fans have not spared even the Prime Minister of India in their intolerance for anti-colonial narratives and sentiment, likely because they fear incurring displeasure of Karolina if they did otherwise.

While falsely attributing anti-India sentiments to Russia by innuendo and direct mention, Karolina has misused caricatures of Indian Prime Minister Modi in her thumbnail to insinuate that Russian President Putin and Russian media despised and spoke unflatteringly of Mr Modi before the Ukraine war but are eagerly cavorting with him now out of selfishness. This is factually incorrect. Mr Putin had welcomed Mr Modi with utmost respect in Astra Khan even so early on in his political career when Mr. Modi was the Chief Minister of India’s Gujarat province and had been at the receiving end of diatribes from political opponents in India as well as a gamut of western media houses which dabbled in illicit politicking on Indian soil out of compulsive habit. Russia state media has never spoken unfavorably of Mr Modi.

Karolina also alleges that under the pretense of forging close relations with India, Russia is simply selfishly coveting a slice of India’s economic success story (on which maybe it wishes to ride piggyback), but in an unguarded moment she has herself admitted that she has been conducting special classes and seminars in Polish schools to enable Polish young generation to take advantage of India’s emerging global clout and stature.

The crux of Karolina Goswami's misleading thesis attributing nefarious motives to Russian co-operation with India, hinges on so called testimony of a Russian dissident named Yuri Bezmenov who had defected to the USA after a stint of posting in India. The unreliability or lack of veracity in his concocted accusations about civilisational abhorence for India in the minds of Russian government planners, can be gauged from the fact that in his memoirs, he has branded the India-backed 1971-era freedom fighters of Bangladesh, as " evil elitist conspiratorial syndicate aimed at destabilisation of East Pakistan". Yuri Bezmenov says that Russian support for the India-backed outbreak of revolution in East Pakistan was the last straw which revolted his sensibilities so much that he formally disowned Russia. In other words Yuri Bezmenov is making a candid admission from the horse's mouth that he was on the same page as the CIA which was India's adversary in 1971,and that he is so ideologically aligned with the East Pakistani regime notorious for holocaust of Bengali Hindus, that he formally parted ways with Russia only because Russia was opposed to that holocaustic Pakistani regime! So much so for the pretentious sympathies towards India and its Hindu majority cultural ethos which he feigns while accusing Russia of subversive and imperialist ambitions in India.

Karolina Goswami's tussle with somebody named Dhruv Rathi who airs views contrary to the majoritarian consensus in India, has furnished her an opportunity which she is fully availing for piggyback riding on a wave of evoked sympathy out of perceived cultural camarederie, and then leveraging such sympathy for rendering the masses impressionable and vulnerable to suggestion, and then hijacking the sentiments of the masses in a different direction for poisoning their minds irrationally against all fellow Indians who refuse to ostracise or alienate Russia, or to maintain friendship with Russia. Karolina's feud with Dhruv Rathi is a subject of law and order, and it is no proof of Karolina's loyalty to India. It could well be a "manufactured" charade enacted by both parties in cahoots.
The public at large is not a party to her tussle with Dhruv Rathi or anybody, and let the law take its course in such matters, and the emotionally manipulative appeals made by Karolina addressing Indian public to save her from Dhruv Rathi make no sense. Protection is the job of law enforcement, and the public is not obliged to jump in the fray of Karolina's squabbles and intrigues. For all we know, she and Dhruv might well be in this together and taking India for a ride. Karolina is weaponsing her real or pretentious tussle with Dhruv Rathi for evincing sympathy from impressionable sections of Indians, and then transmogrifying and redeploying that unguarded naive trust for recruiting the latter as zombies in the acrimonious war of fake narratives waged by Karolina's principals against Russia.
Karolina is a Pole, she is from Poland which is a European country in the EU. Both France and Germany, countries in which Karolina has alleged assaults by Dhruv Rathi fans to have taken place, are big wigs in the EU, because they are the principal contributors to EU GDP and funding. Since the Polish government has very close relations with both France and Germany in the EU as well as NATO, it is best suited for pursuing Karolina's complaints and escalating them with appropriate authorities. The right place for Karolina to fight her case of alleged assaults in France and Germany is to lobby with her own Polish government for canvassing on her behalf with law enforcement authorities inside France and Germany. Technically, France, Geramy and Poland are parts of the same political entity or country, the EU; hence Karolina's complaint is an internal law and order affair of her own country. Karolina is an unofficial ambassador of extra-territorial projection of Poland's politicking influence in India and a front for European EU's neocolonial war of narratives against India who fakes Indic leanings as part of her covert intellectual saboteur agenda. She is more the responsibility of her Polish government more than of anyone else.

The preponderant narrative which emerges from the podcast and comments on one of Karolina Goswami's social media pages is that Russia has always borne sinister hostile intentions towards India in garb of outward friendship, and had murdered Indian ex PM Shastri and nuclear scientist HJ Bhabha, and that Russian society is intrinsically inimical to India whereas Israelis are worthy of blind trust.
Several commentators have complained that Karolina has been immediately deleting their comments in which they have posted logical rejoinders to counter the vicious blanket vilification and demonisation by Karolina's supporters, of all such Indians who harbour congenial or friendly feelings towards Russia. Karolina has gone overboard in her advocacy of the Crusaderic anti-India anti-Russia narrative emanating from the very same sources whom Karolina pretends to dislike and calls by the epithet "Criminal Christian countries". Karolina fans have poured vituperation on Indians at large and commented that Indians simp before Russia because they like to prostitute white Russian females, and commentators calling themselves Karolina's Polish compatriots are badmouthing Indians at large with choicest abuse for having soft feelings for Russia. Karolina has invited a flurry of hate comments against Indians from her supporters on her social media channel, while immediately deleting any rational rejoinders in order to foist a toxic European war propaganda narrative on Indian viewers, with the motive of exerting influence on Indian public opinion on behalf of external forces inimical to India. Comments which could have cleared the air have been immediately deleted, and many more have been “buried”, which means they remain visible on the page only to the poster and to no one else! Karolina fans' insistence on demeaning Indians who harbour favorable opinions of Russia by branding them emotional fools and womanisers, but exhorting them to simp Israel nevertheless, fails to make sense.

While insinuating in her thumbnail that Christian Europeans and Muslim Arabs were savages before becoming civilised through access to Indian knowledge via cultural diffusion, which is one example of Karolina's strategy to sweeten up Hindus for entraining their sympathies for her covert agendas, Karolina Goswami attributes credit for rediscovery India's contributions to global civilisational  heritage, to a British Scotsman named William Dalrymple, eventhough the reality is that Dalrymple has simply sourced his info from candid acknowledgements made by in a bygone era by medieval Arab, Persian, Latino and Byzantine writers, mathematicians or historians, whose works have been translated into English by western scholars but the translated tomes have been sequestered from access to the overwhelming majority of world's populace by dint of recompilation and translation copyrights wielded by those western translators. As a result, those voluminous tomes have been gathering dust in American libraries. The collective west has tried its level best to keep India's contributions to global science and arts under wraps, through misuse of copyrights and IPR's.
Eventhough Karolina might be trying to portray William Dalrymple as a doyen among Indophiles, a perusal of the license he has taken with casting  aspersions in disguise on Indian society do not show his intentions to be exactly flattering to the latter. Attention might be drawn in particular to what the trio of Vincent Smith, Dalrymple and Utpal Kumar have portrayed as the courtesan culture of India. Echoing statements of similar import made by his peer William Dalrymple, Vincent Smith has said that prior to the establiahment of British rule in India, it was customary for the gentry of Indian towns to send their children to brothels of courtesans or prostitutes for getting trained in sophosticated mannerisms and imbibing high society cultural etiquette, apart from learning the finesse of art of love-making. On exerting one's mind a little bit, it would seem that the message is that harlots are the architects of Indian culture or erudition . Far from being champions of Indian magnificience, such opinions rather smack of crypto-racist scorn bordering on malice towards Indian society.

Karolina Goswami's subtle apologism for the ignominous caste system is not in good taste and does not augur well for her reputation among the masses of the country in which she likely fancies prospects of naturalisation. The caste system is an alien innovation wrought by colonists who had barged into India as conquistadors steeped in aneolithic-era ethos from Europe in remote antiquity. European colonists who had thronged India in antiquity had forcibly foisted the anti-Vedic caste system and untouchability on the casteless and classless Arya Vedic masses of India, in cahoots with accomplices among priestcrafty sections of Dravidian-Goanese colonist hegemons who had become overly enamoured of alien Neanderthal culture.
The Veda is a purely spiritual document and it rejects all kinds of societal stratification, no matter whether it be based on job profile, intellectual caliber, aptitude, affluence, work or profession, birth or any of the myriad nonsensical "उपाधि Upadhis which are artificial constructs that cloud the consciousness. The Veda brands all kinds of class and birth distinctions as forms of social terrorism. The Veda also rejects the Western quasi-corpocratic creed of patents, copyrights and database rights which are the epitome of anti-spirituality (Jadatv जड़त्व. The Veda was banished from the public domain under pain of cruel death for defiance. The proto Inquisitadors banned the Vedic Arya masses from reading the Veda, and shamelessly themselves starting claiming preceptorial previliges and crowned themselves self styled custodians of the Veda. The term Rishi in the Veda does not allude to any personality, sentient being or bearded sage but is only a figurative personification of the central theme of the particular Sukta. The terms Braahman, Kshatriya, Vaishya and Shudra in the form in which they occur in the Veda indisputably allude to states of awareness in the sequence of ascent आरोहण and descent of consciousness in one and the same person, during the course of samadhi . In short, one's entire life is the theatre of samadhi, which is played out in the course of a lifetime via both the faculties of cognition and action. The ascent of conscious awareness upto the supra spiritual realm of sublime virtuosity, known as Anandmay आनंदमयकोष, is connoted by the Braahman ब्राह्मण state. There is no such word as Brahmin in the Veda. This state of sublime perception or gyansamadhi ज्ञानसमाधि accrues from steadfast pursuit of virtuosity untarnished by lust and vanity, in which one has relinquished attachment even to the Vigyanmay kosh or the shell of cognition of the transcendental mind. This is symbolically alluded to as the sacrifice of the golden cow (हिरण्य कोश), and that idea sans its import made its way into West Asian tradition as well. But when the elixir of an intellect and disposition throughly purified with the sublime virtuosity immanent in the higher planes of consciousness, descends below to the karmic depths of the plane of actionability, this circumstance is termed as the Kshatriya state in Vedic parlance. This state is also commonly known as karmasamadhi कर्मसमाधि or अवतरण (incarnation) । In this state, the entire gamut of actions performed by the individual becomes suffused with the touch stone of immaculate virtuosity. The elixir (termed as दैवी आप or "divine waters") of lust-free bliss which descends from the supra-spiritual plane to the karmic level of the will is called Ritvi Surya Anahata ऋत्वी सूर्या अनाहता in Vedic parlance, the sound without a gong, which became crystallized much later in Iranian memory as the lady of waters, "Aredvi Sura Anahita" of Avesta after having lost its original meaning. However, the Shudra "शूद्र" state forms the culmination of the yogic alchemy of spiritual evolution of the mind, wherein the mind becomes suffused with unconditional pure love and becomes poised to serve fellow beings with utmost humility, so much so that the elixir fetched from the transcendental plane and brought down to the actionable plane by the descending consciousness, now permeates and pervades the entire society and throughly purifies and invigorates the latter collectively (सु सह अस्तित्व) abbreviated as the Swastika state. The shudra state is the pinnacle of spirituality in the Veda and nowhere close to the derogatory contemptuous connotation it has acquired in the post Vedic pseudo-Hindu literature.

The vast bulk of India's populace are Vedic Hindus by innate default, ie. they are Vedists by virtue of the AtmaVeda आत्म-वेद or the luminance of the inborn विशुद्ध सात्विक प्रज्ञा or sublime intellect refined by austere virtuosity which is naturally immanent in the supra-conscious inner depths of their consciousness, with which they possess uninterrupted non-local instantaneous communion. The pristine Vedic conscience rejects the caste system in all of its forms and disguises, whether purporting to be based on birth, or intellectual caliber or profession or mental ability, or innate proclivity or any other nonsense. It completely rejects the idea of priestly classes and preceptor ship, which are purely Neolithic era Euro-colonial constructs completely alien to Vedic ethos and dogmas.
However, when influential guilds which specialised in priestcraft as familial profession came under eventual ambit of Hinduism as a result of cultural diffusion, they failed to imbibe the essence of Vedism in their psyche but only nominally continued to remain Hindu while retaining their proto- untouchabilist priestcraftism as the core of their ethos. Such covert recidivist influence groups try to impersonate Hinduism today, and sell their services for a price to European conquistador moles, and try to foist despotic religious domination of the European moles on the general public by issuing priestcrafty pontific edicts to that effect, in the hope that at least some impressionable sections of the public will submit like serfs before temporal authority of those moles, out of superstitious fear of invoking displeasure of an imaginary godhead held in popular misperception to be the custodian of priestcraftism. Thus, these corpocults are amenable to hijack by western imperialism whereupon they become tools for projection of foreign imperialist hegemony on indigenous society, culminating in eventual tragic political conquest, by foisting agents of European imperialism as pontifs on the masses by issuing edicts as if the latter were dumb driven cattle. Though such pressure groups are free to enjoy their beliefs, yet the vast majority do not subscribe to their warped doctrine which sanctified their overbearing self-assuming claims to divine authority over the masses.

https://sputnikglobe.com/20200827/betrayal--conspiracy-anti-citizenship-law-protesters-on-bjp-welcoming-anti-national-citizens-1080293036.html

https://sputnikglobe.com/20220421/is-bjp-silently-punishing-muslims-delhi-minorities-bewildered-by-demolition-drive-in-city-1094928517.html

A perusal of past records shows some of the most vehemently India-critic articles appearing in Russian media to be the handiwork of likes of Shweta Sharma and Deexa Khanduri who hail from the same Brahmin clan ilk as Karolina's adopted community by dint of matrimonial alliance. Karolina is a vociferous votary of the caste system which is an anti-Vedist innovation of the Brahmin mind and essentially seeks to foist social hegemony of Brahmin clans on society at large. Without going into the polemics of being for or against them, admittedly such not-so-well-meaning articles authored by Brahmin mischief-mongers in European journals foster misleading notions among European readers suggesting that India persecutes its minorities in the fashion of theocratic dictatorships such as Sudan under Jafar Numeiri. And Poles like Karolina Goswami, who have been co-opted into Brahmin genes cliche, then seize upon anecdotal India-critic articles appearing in the Russian media, often inspired by misleading inputs from correspondents who are Indian (and especially Karolina's own coopted Brahmin coethnicists in flesh and blood), as evidence of Karolina's conjecture claiming Anti-India sentiments to be rampant in Russian society. This game of deceitful mischiev foments bad blood between nations and peoples. Karolina seems unwilling to appreciate or admit that much of what she is misportraying as Russian detestation and distaste for India is actually the manifest outcome of intranecine disagreements and leg-pulling within Brahmin clans.